WWII clearly showed the importance of combat and transport vehicles that could cross water hazards. Crossings of rivers, lakes, channels, and reservoirs made planning any military operation more complicated, reduced the rate of offensives, and led to significant losses among attackers. The USSR performed nearly no work on amphibious vehicles for transport or combat. Only T-37, T-38, and T-40 tanks designed for reconnaissance were accepted into service. They were armed only with machine guns and could not effectively support infantry. After the end of the war the USSR began development of a wide variety of amphibious vehicles.
Monday, 30 November 2020
Friday, 27 November 2020
Black Prince
The British military had strange ideas about what a tank should look like in WWII, which led British tank building into a dead end. It's not surprising that the American Stuart tank became the most common light tank in the British army and the most common medium tank was the Sherman. The British were on their own when it came to heavy tanks, as there was no foreign alternative to the Churchill. That didn't stop the British from making several attempts to replace it throughout the war. The Black Prince I was one such attempt. This was a direct descendant of the Churchill tank that came up short compared to its ancestor.
Wednesday, 25 November 2020
Distorted Tanks
- T-5 tank. Weight: 30 tons. Armament: 1 88 mm gun and 2 machine guns.
- T-12 tank. Weight: 40 tons. Armament: 1 75 mm gun and 4 machine guns.
- V-K-18 tank. Weight: 18 tons. Armament: 1 20 mm gun and 1 machine gun.
Monday, 23 November 2020
Video: Performance of Tanks in Snow
Friday, 20 November 2020
Wednesday, 18 November 2020
Automatic Welding
Monday, 16 November 2020
Still With a Cabin
Usually one or two prototypes are built before a tank goes into production with only a few changes. However, there are exceptions. With IS series of tanks there were three of them, two of which were radically different from the final model. The similarly revolutionary T-44 evolved in a similar way. Even without significant changes in requirements,, this tank went through a series of evolutionary steps. The second variant of this vehicle was created as a result of trials held in February-March 1944. One of the main differences of the intermediate prototype was the armour. Trials showed that it was not enough to protect from the 88 mm Pak 43 L/71.
Friday, 13 November 2020
Background Check
Wednesday, 11 November 2020
T-34 Protection Trials
"Conclusions
Based on the trials of two T-34 hulls and turrets, the commission finds that:
- On the impact of cracks and hot tears around welding on shell resistance:
- When shells impact the area of cracking, the cracks grow negligibly. In many cases cracks do not grow.
- The presence of cracks or hot tears in 40 or 45 mm thick armour does not decrease robustness, but is still an undesirable defect that is caused by the quality of the armour and welding. Ilyich factory and factory #183 need to develop measures to resolve these defects.
- The presence of cracks and hot tears up to 20 mm deep around the weld is unacceptable as they lead to brittle damage to armour when hit. In exceptional cases parts can be permitted with singular cracks or with limited hot tears.
Monday, 9 November 2020
A Step in the Right Direction
Work on a radically new tank often results in the creation of intermediate vehicles. This exact thing happened with Soviet medium tanks in WW2. Several attempts were made to replace the T-34 with modernized vehicles. The first attempt was called T-34M, later the T-43 took a shot at the reigning champion. The results were similar: neither tank replaced the T-34. The first Soviet new generation medium tank, the T-44, travelled a long way and changed a lot before it entered production.

