Monday, 11 May 2015

Aw, Shucks

In a recent interview at Tank and AFV News, famous tank historian Steven Zaloga mentioned something that's been a bit of a hobby of mine:

"In spite of all the stuff that’s been written about the German side, the stuff that’s out there is not very good. A lot of what’s out there on Tiger tanks is very one sided. There are some very good Russian websites that are pointing out all the errors in those Tiger histories, you know German accounts will say “Oh Tiger regiment such and such went this Russian tank unit and destroyed 57 vehicles.” And then the Russians go and look at the unit histories from the Russian side and find that the incident either didn't occur at all or the German tank claims were grossly exaggerated. "

At the time I thought that "very good Russian websites" certainly referred to battlefield.ru or iremember.ru, armor.kiev.ua or one of the other Russian tank history "giants". However, the author of Tank and AFV News recently got a copy of Armored Champion and you'll never guess who's in it.


I must say, I never expected to be next to Thomas Jentz on any list, but here I am.

Sunday, 10 May 2015

Some T-64 Drawings

Livejournal user armor_kiev_ua posted some drawings of the Object 432 (that would later become the T-64).

First is a comparison in size between the M60 Patton (the hypothetical enemy's best and scariest tank at the moment) and the new Soviet tank.


The second is a bit more interesting, showing the composite armour of the hull and turret.






Saturday, 9 May 2015

Victory Parade


"Order of the Supreme Commander

In celebration of victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War, I call for a parade on June 24th, 1945, in the Red Square in Moscow with the active army, navy, and the Moscow garrison, a Victory parade.

Bring the following to the parade: combined regiments from the fronts, combined regiment from the People's Commissariat of Defense, combined regiment of the Navy, military academies and schools, and forces of the Moscow garrison.

The parade will be reviewed by my deputy, Marshall of the Soviet Union, Zhukov.

The victory parade will be commanded by Marshall of the Soviet Union Rokossovskiy.

The commander of the Moscow Military District and garrison chief, Colonel-General Artemyev, will organize the parade.

Supreme commander, Marshall of the Soviet Union, I. Stalin
June 22nd, 1945"

Parades are a big deal, and the Victory Parade was an enormous deal. On June 24th, 1945, every care was taken to ensure that things would go perfectly.


"Plan of preparatory measures
  1. First rehearsal of infantry present in the parade. June 12th, 7:00-9:00, central airstrip.
  2. Dress rehearsal of infantry and cavalry present in the parade. June 17th, 7:00-9:00, central airstrip.
  3. Inspection of all artillery units present in the parade. June 13th, 3:00-5:00, Sadoviy Crescent from Smolensk Square to Krimskiy Bridge.
  4. Inspection and training of all armoured and mechanized units participating in the parade. June 13th, 16:00-18:00, Kuzminki (proving grounds).
  5. Inspection of all vehicles (artillery and moto-mechanized units). June 15th-16th, at night 3:00-5:00, Red Square.
  6. Training of the battle and combined orchestra. June 15th-16th, 3:00-5:00, Red Square.
  7. [Illegible scribble, something about tanks and artillery] June 11th, 2:00-5:00.


"Timing of the Victory Parade on June 24th, 1945

The parade starts at 10:00
  • Reviewer entry: 0 minutes 50 seconds
  • Report of the parade commander and presentation of the list of units present to the reviewer: 00:20
  • Reviewer inspection of forces: 15:00
  • Speech: 10:00
  • Salute: 3:30
  • Commands for a celebratory march: 1:30
  • Movement of infantry: 36:00
  • Time to build up distance for cavalry: 2:00
  • Movement of cavalry: 4:00
  • Movement of artillery: 29:00
  • Movement of armoured and mechanized forces: 21:00
  • Assembly and marching of orchestras: 6:00
Total length: 2 hours 9 minutes 10 seconds
Parade ends at: 12:09:10"



Here is a map of the forces lining up on Red Square. 298 company-sized units would march through it on this day, including engineering units, military academies, artillery, mortars, motorized infantry, and, what interests us the most, a regiment of SU-76 SPGs, a brigade of T-34-85 tanks, a regiment of SU-100s, a regiment of IS-2 tanks, a regiment of ISU-122 SPGs, and a regiment of ISU-152 SPGs.

There was also a little something from German tank units. Not the tanks, of course, as those were rusting from Moscow to Berlin, but their banners. Flags of many German units were thrown to the ground in front of the mausoleum. Unlike the banners of SS units, they were not burned, but distributed among museums. The following tank units had their banners disgraced, out of a total of 26 regimental banners, 138 battalion banners, and 36 squadron banners.
  • 9th tank battalion
  • 1st battalion, 2nd tank regiment
  • 1st battalion, 31st tank regiment
  • 2nd battalion, 68th SPG regiment
  • 1st battalion, 27th tank regiment
  • 1st battalion, 1st tank brigade
  • 1st battalion, 15th tank brigade
  • 67th tank battalion
  • 11th AT gun squadron
  • 15th AT gun squadron
  • 9th AT gun squadron

Friday, 8 May 2015

70 Years of Victory

70 years ago, on May 8th (although it was already May 9th by Moscow time), the war against Germany finally came to an end.


"Order of the Supreme Commander 

To the forces of the Red Army and Navy

"On May 8th, 1945, in Berlin, representatives of the German supreme command signed an act of unconditional surrender of the German armed forces.

The Great Patriotic War of the Soviet people against German-fascist invaders has been successfully completed, Germany is completely defeated.

Comrades Red Armymen, Red Seamen, Aergeants, NCOs, officers of the Army and Navy, Generals and Marshalls, I congratulate you on a victorious conclusion to the Great Patriotic War.

To celebrate the complete victory over Germany, today, on May 9th, the Day of Victory, at 22:00, Moscow, the capital of our Motherland, salutes the glorious forces of the Red Army, ships, and units of the Navy that achieved this glorious victory: 30 artillery volleys from one thousand guns.

Eternal glory to the heroes that fell for freedom and independence of our Motherland!

Glory to the victorious Red Army and Navy!

Supreme Commander, Marshall of the Soviet Union, I. Stalin"


"Order of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR

On the declaration of May 9th as the Holiday of Victory

In order to celebrate the victorious conclusion of the Soviet people against the Germano-fascist invaders in the Great Patriotic War and historical victories of the Red Army, leading to the complete defeat of Hitler's Germany, which surrendered unconditionally, it is established that May 9th will be a day of celebration for all peoples: Victory Day.

Consider May 9th a work holiday.

Chair of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, M. Kalinin
Secretary of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, A. Gorkin"

Thursday, 7 May 2015

World of Tanks History Section: French Tanks, Pre-War and Post-War

FCM 36

By the 1930s, the Renault FT 17 was completely obsolete. A request for tender was sent out for a new infantry support tank, which was won by the Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée company (FCM).

The prototype began trials in April of 1935, and was accepted into production in 1936, after design improvements and increase in armour thickness from 30 to 40 mm. The vehicle was indexed FCM 36.

This tank was truly innovative. It had thick shellproof angled armour, which provided excellent protection from AT guns of the time. The diesel engine provided it with great range on one tank of fuel. The completely welded hull was also a novelty at the time.

The FCM 36 met all military requirements, but it had two drawbacks. It was heavy for tanks of its class (12.35 tons) and was very expensive. In total, only 100 tanks of this type were built.

Renault R35/R40

This tank was developed in 1934 as an infantry support tank. It was not as innovative as the FCM 36, as it used a cast hull with riveted elements, with nearly vertical armour. On the other hand, more traditional assembly methods lowered the vehicle's cost.

The R35 weighed 10.6 tons and used a short 37 mm gun as well as a rifle caliber machinegun. The maximum thickness of the armour was 44 mm. The crew consisted of two men. In 1938, the tank was equipped with a longer 37 mm gun and an improved suspension. The weight of the tank grew to 12.5 tons. This modification was indexed R40. 120 such tanks were made.

The Renault R35 was France's most numerous light tank during WWII. 1500 vehicles of this type were built, over 550 of which were exported. The French army used these tanks in all theaters: Europe, Syria, Tunis, Algiers.

SOMUA S35

This medium tank was meant for cavalry units. It was developed in 1935, and until 1940 was considered a very good tank, used only by domestic forces.

The tank hull was cast, and assembled with rivets. The turret was also cast, and only fit one crewman. The armour was up to 40 mm thick, and its armament consisted of a 47 mm cannon and a 7.5 mm machinegun. The crew consisted of three men. About 500 units were made.

During WWII, these tanks were used in France and Tunis. 300 S35s were captured and used by Germans, including action against the USSR. Some of these tanks were converted into tractors. In 1944, after France returned to Europe as an independent state, the army captured a number of SOMUA tanks back from the Germans.

S40/SARL 42

In the spring of 1942, technical requirements for a modernization of the SOMUA S35 were composed. The hull and suspension were to be redesigned, but the first prototype of this series also received a turret upgrade. The S40 was supposed to begin production in July of 1940, but the war interfered.

In 1942, on occupied territory, in deep secrecy, a group of engineers led by Maurice Lavirotte started working on a project to modernize the S40. The main idea was to improve the tank's characteristics with minimal changes the engine or suspension. A new turret was designed by the ARL company for this tank, so it would be indexed SARL 42.

The new hull had sloped armour, a simplified shape, and a new turret ring. The ARL turret had a very low silhouette and was completely welded, which was odd for French tanks.

Work on the SARL 42 ended in the fall of 1942, when Germany completely occupied France.

Renault G1R

Requirements for a new medium infantry support tank were formulated in the mid 1930s. After revisions to the requirements (60 mm of armour, a gun capable of knocking out enemy armour, etc), the project was undertaken by seven companies, including Renault. Their entry was named G1R.

Initially, the designers planned an unmanned turret with an autoloader mechanism, one of the first ideas of its kind. Unfortunately, it was too difficult to produce at the time.

The G1R consisted of a cast hull with sloped armour. The hemispherical turret was shifted towards the rear of the hull. It had a 47 mm gun, but an upgrade to a 75 mm gun was also in the works.

One prototype was built, but work was not finished before the German invasion in 1940.

AMX 30 1st prototype

After a long hiatus from tank design caused by the war, France restored its school of design relatively quickly. In 1956, a joint Franco-German program was launched to develop a new battle tank.

The French doctrine was, at first glance, contestable. Their designers sacrificed thick armour for mobility and a small size. In reality, HEAT shells became so advanced that thick armour was no longer impressive, but a small and fast tank would be hard to hit for the enemy.

The first prototype of this vehicle, indexed AMX 30, was built in 1961. This was the lightest NATO tank of the first generation. It could accelerate to a speed of 65 kph on a highway and had a 105 mm gun.

After trials and improvements that lasted until 1965, the AMX 30 was approved for use by the French army.

AMX 30B

This modification of the vehicle was developed in 1966 and entered production in 1967. The hull was composed of welded cast and rolled elements, the turret was completely cast.

The new tank had a commander's cupola with a panoramic sight and a multi-fuel diesel engine. The 105 mm gun could be controlled by either the gunner or the commander. The barrel was equipped with a thermal casing to improve precision. The tank had an additional 20 mm autocannon or 12.7 mm machinegun, as well as a 7.62 mm machinegun, controlled remotely.

The French still placed their bet on mobility. The mass of the AMX 30B increased from 30 tons to 36, but the speed did not decrease due to an improved engine. The AMX 30 and its modifications served in the French army until 1997.

Article author: Vladimir Pinayev

Original article available here.

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

TG-3

German engineer Eduard Grote is most famous for two tanks: his insane 1000-ton colossus and a much more reasonable, but still too expensive, medium TG-1 tank. His other projects are less known, including at least one other superheavy, and one medium tank, which will be described here.

"December 3rd, 1931
#5886

Minutes of the VOAO Technical Commission with the participation of the People's Commissar of Naval and Military Affairs to review the new tank project by engineer Grote.

Present:
  • Chief of the experimental department at the Bolshevik factory, Barykov
  • VOAO Design Bureau #3 Chief, Ginsburg
  • VOAO Design Bureau #3 Senior Engineer, Professor V.I. Zaslavskiy, B.S. Andryhevich
  • Assistant to the chief of the 2nd RKKA HQ directorate, A.V. Konanchuk
The commission reviewed a preliminary project for a new tank by engineer Grote, indexed TG-3, with the following characteristics.

The TG-3 project is an attempt by the author to design a fast 30-ton medium tank with a convertible drive based on his first design.

Two parallel engines are placed in the front of the tank, each separately connected by crankshafts with gearboxes and final drives, powering the track on its side. The tank is suspended from five large road wheels on each side. The two rear wheels propel the tank when tracks are removed. All armament is placed between the middle and rear of the tank. The vehicle is controlled by pneumatics (compressed air from special compressors). Crew: commander, two mechanics, five gunners, total 8 men.

Having reviewed the project, the commission deems that:
  1. Combat elements
    1. Armament: the front placement of the engine means that the turret and armament are in the rear of the tank, increasing the dead zone in front of the tank to 8-9 meters. The double transmission set in the fighting compartment drastically reduces the free space in it, and severely limits the usefulness of its armament (some of it is simply inaccessible), and also results in a severely inadequate amount of ammunition on board. The tank armament can be used in the following ways:
      1. Short 75 mm gun: horizontal arc of 60 degrees.
      2. One 37 mm gun or machinegun in the main turret: 360 degrees.
      3. 37 mm guns in sponsons: 10-20 degree horizontal arc. If the 75 mm gun is being used, using these guns is difficult or impossible.
      4. Two machineguns in the rear sponsons: shooting from these is difficult to impossible. One of the machineguns can cover a 40 degree arc.
        In general, if one was to get rid of the unnecessarily bloated armament, the following could be used with greater effectiveness: 75 mm gun and ONE machinegun in the front, and ONE 37 mm gun and ONE machinegun in the turret. Only TWO guns and THREE machineguns, instead of the proposed FOUR guns and FOUR machineguns. 
    2. Visibility: the visibility for the driver is unacceptable, as the driver cannot see the ground in front of his tank closer than 25-30 meters. On an incline, the driver cannot see forward at all. The special periscope the author proposes to mount on the bottom of the front hull does not increase the angle of visibility. As a result, the tank will have unacceptable handling on obstacles.
    3. Ability to cross trenches and walls: equivalent to a 16 ton medium tank, not a medium-heavy.
    4. Fording depth: 0.75 meters. Less than the fording depth of a light tank. Water hazards are impassable.
    5. Medium speed: based on the experimental nature of the engines, their power will be no better than 600 hp, with a tank that is likely going to weigh no less than 35 tons (both of these are opinions of the commission). The proposed maximum speed of 50-60 kph and high speeds on tracks will be unattainable with this engine power. With the selected gear ratios, the tank will have a lower maximum and average speed (half as much).
    6. Transport via railroads: a 50 ton special platform for concentrated weight will be needed, and the tank will hang off the sides by 340 mm (total width: 3000 mm), which will make loading and unloading difficult.
    7. Range: the 400-430 Liters of fuel provide no more than 30 hours of work for a diesel engine or 23 hours for a gasoline engine at 70% of full power, which is half of the current norm, and is unacceptable.
    8. Armour: armour is no more than 20 mm.
  2. Design elements:
    1. Engine: the two-stroke experimental engine (oil or gasoline) is only shown to the commission via diagrams. The commission deems that there are no guarantees that the engine will have the necessary power or reliability, especially when turbocharged, as with Grote's previous engine.
    2. Engine compartment: the position of the engines and transmission make it impossible to use any of our aircraft engines, to cool them adequately, vent exhaust, or install additional components (compressor). These components are positioned very generally by the author, and are partially missing. Exhaust and hot air will find their way to the fighting compartment, where they will make the crew's work in a crowded space difficult. In order to function normally, the engines must work synchronously, but the synchronicity is violated when the tank turns, which will result in drawbacks well known in English Tailor tanks and our own experimental vehicles.
    3. Transmission: the provided dimensions of the gearboxes and convertible drive are impossible. The actual dimensions will be much larger, which will reduce the size of the fighting compartment, as stated above. The concentration of controls for the transmission, engines, and turns on an automobile type steering column will result in a complicated experimental design, which is unlikely to succeed, and is poorly thought through by the author. The transmission is primitive and inefficient. 
    4. Suspension: the suspension is too heavy and excessively large.
    5. The proposed road wheel balancer system is primitive, poorly thought out, and unreliable.
    6. The aforementioned drawbacks limit the implementation of turning wheels. The vehicle's problems with maneuverability will be multiplied by the overloaded rear drive wheels. This factor will result in high ground pressure, and will reduce performance on roads and bridges, especially in mud. It is not possible to turn using only the friction clutches when on wheels.
    7. The tracks are identical to the first proposal, but modified to make them easier to disconnect. The drawback of stretching has not been resolved. Installing spurs on these tracks will result in significant oscillations of the road wheels.
  3. Conclusions:
    1. As the first TG tank that has already seen trials, TG-3 is a project undertaken by Grote's initiative, who has a rich imagination and significant design experience, but no experience with tank designs. Both vehicles were designed by him alone with some corrections made to the first design after RKKA and OGPU critiques, but with no solid grounding in RKKA requirements. 
    2. The new TG-3 project does not satisfy RKKA requirements due to its overall design and aforementioned defects. In terms of the overall layout, it is even worse than the first TG. The commission deems further development of this project senseless. 
    3. Engineer Grote's desire for a special tank engine for tanks that weigh only 25-30 tons is notable. The commission considers that when designing tanks of this class, a special tank engine must be designed: small, simple, light, reliable, capable of being used in a variety of places.
    4. Based on points 1-3 and our exhaustion of all positive experiences resulting from Engineer Grote's work, the commission considers it pointless to seek further assistance from him in further tank designs."

Tuesday, 5 May 2015

Machinegun Wobbler

Unconventional anti-tank warfare is not that uncommon, it seems. A brave man that climbs on top of a tank can do some serious damage.

"Award Order for Red Armyman of the 91st Tank Regiment, 46th Tank Division, 21st Mechanized Corps, Sered Ivan Pavlovich

Worthy of title of Hero of the Soviet Union.
  1. Year of birth: 1919
  2. Nationality: Ukrainian
  3. Party affiliation: none
  4. In the RKKA since: 1939
Brief and specific description of heroism or achievements: In battles near Dvinsk, he leapt up on an enemy tank, and, grasping the machinegun barrel with his hand, began to wobble it up and down, disrupting the tank's ability to shoot. With this courageous act, he showed exemplary heroism. As a scout, he blew up a German tank, killed 20 motorcyclists, and captured 3 soldiers.

He is worthy of the title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

Commander of the 21st Mechanized Corps, Major General, Hero of the Soviet Union, Lelyushenko
July 11th, 1941"

CAMD RF 33-793756-43

Monday, 4 May 2015

Canadian Valentines

"Attention, Red Army tank unit commanders

As of November 1942, Angus Shops (Montreal, Canada) began shipping Canadian infantry tanks "Valentine VII" to the Soviet Union to fulfil the second order of the Soviet government. The serial numbers of these tanks start at #789 (War Department number 73592).

The second order vehicles are largely the same as the first order, but there are a few differences to which attention must be paid. Here is a list of modifications:
  1. Electrical and radio equipment:
    1. Instead of 2 12-volt batteries, there are now 4 6-volt batteries, of which two remain in the previous place (right side of the fighting compartment) and two are now in the driver's compartment, on the left. The load (radio, lights, turning mechanism, etc) are all evenly spread between the batteries, which is a positive change from the old two battery system, where the load was asymmetric. The 6-volt batteries are interchangeable with those from English made Valentine tanks.
    2. As follows from part 1, wiring in the hull and turret changed.
    3. The intercom power supply (+12 volts) is in series with the signal bell.
    4. The signal bell is in series with the festoon lights, which has its own fuse.
    5. Each plug for a portable lamp is on its own circuit with its own fuse.
    6. An indicator light has been added (left panel). It is attached to the +24 volt wire coming from the voltage regulator to the main charging generator. When the light is on, the main battery switch is off, the generator is not charging, and the battery is being discharged.
    7. The ammeter is attached to the +24 volt wire. This wire is connected to the indicator light and generator. This wire has its own fuse.
    8. The loads in the hull and turret are connected to the batteries where the negative terminal is connected to the hull of the tank.
    9. The starter is turned on behind the main switch. In order to turn it on, you must turn on the main battery switch. The switch design differs from the old one, but the labels are the same (on, off). The circuit has its own fuse, same as in the old design, but in the new design it is located on the left control panel in the five-fuse box. This fuse is the furthest one on the left. The same fuse is connected to the starter solenoid and the turret traverse mechanism (see labels on the box).
    10. There is a slot for a so called "convoy light" in the rear armour plate to aid tanks following one another at night. Since the factory did not receive the right lenses, the first tanks of this batch will be sent without lights, with the opening welded shut. Subsequent batches will include these lights.
    11. 2 electric mechanisms for the smoke grenade launches are included in the system, with a fuse for each. The containers for smoke grenades are installed on the left and right sloped plates (glacis) above the transmission. Each container takes two smoke grenades. The driver can activate the left or right grenade launcher with a button (see the left control panel for labels "left smoke generator" and "right smoke generator") to create a smokescreen to the left or the right of the tank. Both launchers can be activated at once.
    12. The radio bay changed, and the #19 Wireless Set cannot be replaced with the #11 Wireless Set. Because of this:
      1. The second order vehicles have no opening for a #11 antenna.
      2. The 12 volt wire that went to the control box in the turret is no longer present.
      3. The driver's intercom mount has changed and no longer contains a loudspeaker for driver-commander communication.
      4. The openings in the shelf do not allow for installation of a #11 Wireless Set.
      5. If the #19 Wireless Set is damaged and must be replaced, it can only be replaced with a #19 Wireless Set. If you only have a #11 Wireless Set, you must find a first order tank with a #19 Wireless Set and replace it, using the #19 Wireless Set on the second order tank. A #11 Wireless Set can be easily installed in a first order tank.
    13. An extra fuse and +12 volt wire has been added for the #19 Wireless Set MkII.
  2. Overall tank, individual components, and location of equipment:
    1. The commander's electromagnetic emergency diesel engine shutoff switch was replaced with a mechanical one, located in the rear left corner of the fighting compartment (find the handle labelled _______ in English, which in Russian means "push the handle to turn off the diesel engine"). The mechanical switch is more reliable and does not need to be adjusted, like the electromagnetic one.
    2. The driver's emergency shutoff switch is also mechanical, replacing the old type. The shutoff handle in second order tanks is to the left of the driver on the floor of the tank, whereas it was previously on the right control panel (see "Canadian Valentine Tank technical manual fig. 10). This handle has three positions, as before:
      1. Position for motion: the handle is pushed completely forward. Nozzles and air intakes are open.
      2. Position for stopping: the handle is in an intermediate position, partially pulled backwards. The nozzles are closed, the air intakes are open.
      3. Emergency stop position: the handle is pulled all the way back. The nozzles and air intakes are closed.
    3. The position of the water cooling system has changed. The water pipes that connected the engine and radiator are now on the right side of the engine. This allows better access to them and there is no need to remove the pipes to remove the sediment trap as before. This was a drawback of earlier tanks.
    4. In addition to the existing oil radiator, a pipe cooler is installed in second order tanks made up of 6 ribbed pipes, standard #19, 3/4", located perpendicular to the tank, behind the cooling fan. The radiator is in series between the engine and the oil tank, when the oil is returned to the tank. The new cooler increases the effectiveness of the diesel engine and improves working conditions.
    5. An additional 26 gallon fuel tank has been added on the left side of the tank, connected to the main tank with a rubber hose. The additional tank provides approximately 80 km of extra range, increasing the total range before refuelling to 230 km. The tank is designed to be used before entering battle, so the driver can jettison the tank by pulling a lever on the left of the driver's compartment, which frees the tank and it rolls off the side. The level is labelled "______" in English, which means "freeing mechanism" in Russian. The "jettison tank" position of the lever is all the way to the front. The "mount tank" position is all the way to the back.
      Keep in mind the following:
      1. Diesel fuel in the auxiliary tank is used up first, as the fuel will flow from the auxiliary tank to the main tank when the auxiliary fuel is expended.
      2. The auxiliary tank is a little higher than the hull of the tank, and since the gun mechanism has not changed, it is possible to depress the gun far enough to put it in a position where the first shot will tear off the auxiliary tank and damage the tank. If you must shoot during a march, do not shoot at a low angle when your gun is located in the third quadrant (180-270 degrees) or immediately jettison the tank.
      3. Fuel flows from the auxiliary tank to the main tank due to a pump, which is why the following steps must be followed with installing the tank:
        1. Fill up the main tank completely.
        2. Install the fiber, asbestos, or rubber liner, and close the cap.
        3. Carefully check all components in the system that connects the main tank and auxiliary tank, as even if a little bit of air is sucked in, fuel will not move from the auxiliary tank to the main tank. In order to check if the system is air-tight, put the end of the hose into a cup or glass of diesel fuel and see if it pumps fuel into the main tank.
        4. If the pumping is noticeable visually, you can fill the auxiliary tank and connect the two with the hose. Check how much fuel remains in the auxiliary tank whenever possible.
    6. The hand pump that moves the fuel to the two space heaters (necessary to start the engine in cold weather) was moved from the left control panel to the right of the driver, behind him. The induction coils are still on the left control panel (look for a label in Russian that says "heating"). The procedure of starting the engine in cold weather is the same as before, counting the aforementioned changes (see "Canadian Valentine Tank technical manual p. 23).
    7. The driver's seat was simplified, as the old design was too complex and poorly thought out (the driver could not adjust the seat if he was already sitting in it). 
    8. A compass was installed in front of the driver, on the friction clutch mount.
    9. Steel plates were welded to the top of the turret platform to protect the turret ring from being jammed with shells or shrapnel. However, this was not done on all tanks of the second order, but only on tanks ##821-839, and then starting with tank #895 and above.
    10. The ball bearings in the turret ring have been reinforced.
    11. The adjustable idler mount has also been reinforced, but is interchangeable with the old type.
    12. The hydraulic shock absorber has been improved. The external casing is no longer screwed on, everything is placed in one unit. The new shock absorber is interchangeable with the old one, both completely and in parts.
      The most important thing to remember is that the new shock absorber must be filled with special oil (CS 1402, see instructions 1177).
      The oil consists 50% of castor oil and 50% diacetone alcohol. It is imperative that you do not use mineral oil, as was possible with the old shock absorber (see blueprint 807) which was installed on the first 753 Canadian Valentines, as all seals in the new desingn are made from natural rubber.
    13. The rubber tires with retention rings which were installed on the drive wheel were replaced with a special steel ring, attached to the inner surface of the sprocket.
    14. The gearbox lever case was improved, removing the problems faced on first order tanks when activating the first reverse gear.
    15. The gas pedal was replaced with mechanical controls (levers and cords) as tanks of the first order had trouble with this control system.
    16. A new controller "3A" was installed for the turret traverse mechanism. This mechanism makes horizontal aiming very precise. The carrier for the controller was also changed.
    17. The center of the rear armour plate has a slot for a quick-release tow hook (see 4. openings in the rear plate for the tow hook carrier). Currently, the factory has not received these hooks and tanks will be sent without hooks until December.
    18. Due to a requirement for more tools, the right side of the tank has a new, larger toolbox.
    19. The fuel lines have been replaced with synthetic rubber hoses instead of copper pipes.
    20. The remote control for the gun and Browning machinegun has been simplified and improved.
    21. The internal and external equipment layout changed, but the ammunition carried remained nearly the same. The only difference is the placement of ammunition for the Bren machinegun changed from 25 magazines, 28 rounds each, to 13 magazines of 28 rounds each (364 rounds) and 4 100 round aircraft type magazines (400 rounds), total of 764 rounds.
    22. Requirements for lubrication changed slightly (see "lubrication diagram").
    23. The tool requirements changed, some items were added or replaced (track vice, etc) and others were added (see list of instruments and tools in the toolbox of the Valentine VII, Schedule B)
The above list of main modifications to the second order Canadian Valentine VII tank,made in accordance to the design of the English Valentine tank and English blueprints, means there is nearly no difference between Canadian tanks and English tanks. 

Notes:
  1. Most of the labels on the left control panel and right control panel differ from the labels on tanks of the first order (the only things left on the right panel are the thermometer of the cooling system and control panel light).
  2. All other labels (directing unpacking, equipment, etc) that follow from those above are described by a Russian language instruction manual, included in every tank.
  3. For convenience and safety, the auxiliary fuel tank was removed from each tank, and is being sent separately in a special crate. When it arrives in the unit, install it on your tank.
  4. Two containers for smoke grenades are also not attached to the tank and are packed separately in the toolbox. Install them upon arrival.
  5. The compass was removed from the binnacle and stored in the turret above the radio. Install it upon arrival."

Sunday, 3 May 2015

American Tank Spurs

Much like the Soviets, the Americans ran into problems with tank tracks slipping on ice. Their solution was the same: spurs.





Of course, some solutions were a bit more primitive.

Saturday, 2 May 2015

Meeting at Elbe

"To the commanders of the 61st, 47th, 3rd and 5th Shock, 8th Guards, 3rd, 69th, 33rd, and 1st Polish Armies
To the commanders of the 1st and 2nd Guards Tank Divisions
To the commander of the 16th Air Army
To the commanders of the 2nd and 7th Guards Cavalry Corps

Copies: chiefs of artillery and armoured forces of the Front, chief of the engineering forces of the Front, chief of Front communications, Front political chief.

In accordance with decree #11075 issued on April 23rd by the Stavka of the Supreme Command, I order that:

When meeting American or English forces, follow these guidelines:
  1. The senior commander in the area where the meeting occurs must immediately contact the senior American or English commander and establish a border in accordance with Stavka decrees outlined in my directive #00583 issued on April 21st, 1945. Do not tell them any information about our plans or combat missions.
  2. Do not initiate any organization of friendly meetings.
    When meeting allied forces, be friendly. If American or English forces wish to organize a celebration or friendly meeting, do not refuse and send our representatives. Immediately report any such invitation up the chain of command and only reply positively with the permission of a senior commander no lower than a corps commander. After such a meeting, you may invite representatives from the American or English armies to meet with us.
    Organize such a meeting with the permission of a senior commander no lower than a corps commander. Carefully instruct officers and generals chosen to serve as representatives for a friendly meeting with American or English representatives on their manners and behaviour towards the latter, keeping in mind this directive and military secrecy. 
  3. Our forces must, in all cases, be an example or order and discipline. All generals and officers must keep to uniform standards and look presentable. This is demanded of all forces that can have contact with American or English forces.
    If their representatives visit us, direct your utmost attention to precise order and organization during  their visit. Do not receive them in HQ buildings, but organize a separate building especially for this purpose.
  4. When encountering allied forces, report to the Front HQ with the place, time, and number of the unit.
Commander of the 1st Belorussian Front, Marshall of the Soviet Union, G. Zhukov
Member of the 1st Belorussian Front Military Council, Lieutenant-General Telegin
HQ Chief of the 1st Belorussian Front, Colonel-General Malinin
April 24th, 1945"


"To the Chief of the Political Directorate of the 1st Ukrainian Front, Major-General comrade Yashechkin

Report from the Political Department of the 5th Guards Army
Contents: On the meeting with representatives of the 69th and 104th Infantry Divisions of the 1st American Army

On April 23rd, an infantry battalion from the 173rd Guards Infantry Regiment, 58th Guards Order of the Red Banner Krasnograd Infantry Division, commanded by Captain Neda, reached the eastern shore of the Elbe river near the city of Torgau (west of the river) and fortified near a bridge.

On April 25th, during the day, and American soldier on the bell tower of a church in Torgau wavef flags and yelled something unintelligible. Not knowing the language, our men assumed it was a German. Lieutenant Selvashin attempted to speak to him in German, but received no answer. Our soldiers fired several shots at the bell tower.

A non-Russian soldier exited the bell tower and yelled two words in Russian: "Moscow - America". That is when we discovered that these were American soldiers and demanded that one of them come over. The American soldier that came told us that he was a part of an American scout group that was sent to discover the position of Russian forces. He was soon followed by an American officer, which told us that the scouts were from the 69th Infantry Division of the 1st Army and asked for one of our officers to accompany him to their HQ, saying that his battalion was located 15 kilometers from there.

According to the invitation, at 23:30 on April 25th, 1945, our regimental representatives, consisting of the deputy commander Major Ilarionov, commander of the second battalion, Captain Neda, Guards Lieutenant Selvashina, and Guards Sergeant Andreev arrived at the American divisional HQ, which was located 40 km west of the river. Neither American nor German forces were encountered on the way, only small groups of Germans that asked the Americans where the POW gathering places were.

Upon arrival at the HQ of the 69th Infantry Division, our representatives were met by an American Major. American soldiers met them with hostility, thinking they were prisoners, but when they discovered that these were Soviet officers, they applauded, yelled various greetings to the Red Army and the Soviet people, tore stars off the officers' shoulderboards and cut off their buttons, each trying to get a souvenir. Then the officers were received by the commander of the 69th American Infantry Division, Major-General Reinhardt. 

The meeting was very friendly. The General and his officers took photos with our representatives, and agreed on another meeting, after which General Reinhardt and Brigadier General Marest accompanied them with an escort on 13 Willys Jeeps to Torgau.

On April 26th, at 11:00, the commander of the 69th Infantry Regiment met with commander of the 173rd Guards Infantry Regiment Major Rogov (as asked by the American officer). The meeting was held on the bridge across the Elbe at Torgau. Both officers were accompanied by other officers from the regiments. Comrade Rogov and the American commander exchanged brief greeting speeches. Both stressed the importance of friendship between the two peoples and armies and their mutual efforts to bring about the defeat of Hitler's Germany. The American commander asked: "What are your orders?" Comrade Rogov replied that his orders were to reach the Elbe and wait for further orders. He then invited the Americans for breakfast. The American officers behaved freely. Each one aimed to obtain some souvenir, taking stars from shoulderboards, trading their rank insignia, exchanging watches and handkerchiefs.

In the afternoon, a meeting was held between the commander of the 58th Guards Infantry Division, Major General comrade Rusakov and the commander of the American 69th Infantry Division, Major-General Reinhardt. Present from our side: HQ chief Guards Lieutenant-Colonel Rudnik, commander of the 173rd Guards Infantry Regiment Major Rogov, and other officers. General Reinhardt was accompanied by his deputy, Brigadier General Marest and HQ Chief Colonel Pilinch. About 70 journalists were present from American, English, French, and Soviet newspapers, as well as several film crews. TASS representative at the 1st American Army Zhdanov and writer Konstantin Semenov were also present. The meeting was held at the governor's house on the eastern shore of the Elbe in the area of the second battalion of the 173rd GIR.

Major-General Rusakov and Major General Reinhardt exchanged greeting speeches. In his speech, the American General declared:

"These are the happiest days of my life. I am proud and happy that my division was the first to meet with the heroic Red Army. Two great Allied armies meet on German soil. This meeting will bring the final defeat for the German army."

In his response, Major-General Rusakov said:

"Today is a long awaited and joyous day. Two great armies meet in Germany. The heroic Red Army made its journey of fierce battle and glorious victory. We are glad to meet American forces on enemy territory. The meeting of the two allied armies is a historical event in the fight against Hitler's Germany. Let this meeting be the cornerstone of final defeat of Hitler's army and a lasting peace."

Major General Reinhardt presented Major-General Rusakov with the American national flag.

The celebration arranged by Major-General Rusakov to commemorate the meeting of two great armies elapsed in a friendly and warm environment. Major General Reinhardt, Brigadier General Marest, and accompanying officers of the 1st Army congratulated the officers of the 58th Guards Infantry Division with their glorious victories and expressed joy and awe at the heroism of the Russian army.

Major General Reinhardt made a toast to the health and glory of the Soviet leader and inspiration behind the victories of the Red Army, Marshall of the Soviet Union, comrade Stalin.

On April 26th, at 18:00, a meeting between our forces and allied forces occurred in the sector of the 118th Infantry Division, west of the Elbe and south-west of the city of Priesitz. Our representatives in this meeting were the commander of the first infantry company of the 527 Regiment, 118th Division, Captain Ushakov, and the commander of the first platoon in that company, Lieutenant Kondrashev. 5 American soldiers led by Lieutenant Shink with a raised flag approached our unit in a Willys. They were met by our soldiers, and then Ushakov and Kondrashev. These were scouts from the American 104th Infantry Division, commanded by Major General Ellen. The warriors of the two armies first greeted each other in an official manner, and then with an unofficial handshake. Today, here, beyond the German river of Elbe, Ushakov, a veteran of Stalingrad, shakes the hand of Lieutenant Shink as though he was his own brother.

Our soldiers and officers that were present behaved themselves well and acted in a disciplined fashion. On the other hand, the Americans were somewhat relaxed.  

The soldiers compared their uniforms. One of our Sergeants said that "Our generals are easy to spot from afar, they are clothed in a distinct uniform. Your generals are hard to tell apart from a soldier. The Red Army uniform is better, from common soldier to general."

There were no incidents during this meeting.

Today, on the right shore of the Elbe, near the sector of the 173rd Guards Infantry Division, the commander of the 34th Guards Infantry Corps Guards Major-General Baklanov met the commander of the American 5th Corps.

Political Department Chief of the 5th Guards Army, Guards Major-General Katkov."


Other meetings in the area went about the same. Lots of vague noncommittal statements of peace and victory from both sides (really, you could swap the PR departments and no one would notice), inscriptions of some slogans in both languages, concerts and dinners, lots of reporters scurrying around, interviewing Soviet soldiers and taking photos. One correspondent from the Saint Louis newspaper Post Dispatch attempted to leave the meeting and wander around in the Soviet rear, but was stopped and sent back across the Elbe.

Much like an American flag was given in the above scenario, Baklanov gave a flag to the Americans that was carried to the Elbe from Stalingrad. 

There were also various discussions on military matters. The Americans wished to build a bridge across the Elbe, asked about Soviet unit composition and T-34 technical characteristics. 

Some notable people that were present at the celebrations were included in the reports, largely Eastern European immigrants to America, or Soviet prisoners freed from German camps. American treatment of German civilians was discussed, including their tendency to leave existing civil administration in charge. 

Observations were made that American officers (including fairly senior ones) were seen demanding wine from the locals at Torgau and looting their belongings. An incident was recorded where a German doctor told some Russian officers that he had some medication that he wanted them to take lest it fall into the hands of the Americans, and then told the same thing to the Americans. His attempt to cause a conflict between the two forces failed, however, and he was escorted out of the building by some Americans. Upon their return, they were asked what happened to the doctor, but the only response was a "wave of the hand and a whistle".

Among all the unofficial exchanges of knick-knacks and souvenirs, an official exchange of awards was performed.