Showing posts with label KV-220. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KV-220. Show all posts

Monday, 3 April 2023

Heavy Without Alternatives

One can often encounter brainstorms about how individual vehicles or even entire tank building schools ought to have evolved. Most of these brainstorms are done by people that are far removed from the field of history, but sometimes even notorious historians take part in this exercise. Among Soviet tanks, the T-28 is a popular character in alternative history. Modern improvements to this tank know no bounds, but the fact that the T-28 was replaced by the KV-1 and not the T-34 is often ignored, as is the fact that a replacement for the T-28 by the name of T-29 already existed. 

Object 237 accepted into service with the Red Army as the IS-85 (IS-1).

The IS-85 heavy tank was accepted into service with the Red Army on September 4th, 1943. This was the finale of the program aimed at developing a successor to the KV. One can often hear claims that if the KV remained in production and was modernized then it could be made into a heavy tank that was no worse than the IS-85. You may laugh, but these claims were not just made by alternative historians. Attempts to preserve the KV-85 were made at the highest levels, even in 1944. Nevertheless, the KV had to make room on the assembly line for its successor. Read on to find out why this happened and why there was no alternative to the IS tank.

Friday, 3 June 2022

Za Rodinu!

With the benefit of hindsight, it's easy to tell what intelligence is valid and what is not. However, in the moment, even mostly correct information takes on a very strange form.

This is one such example. 


Wednesday, 30 June 2021

KV's Replacements

 "To the Chief of the BTU, Military Engineer 1st Class comrade Korobkov
January 31st, 1941

I report the status of the work on the T-150 and T-220 tanks at the Kirov factory as of January 28th, 1941. The T-150 and T-220 tanks are still not ready for trials and have not been presented to the commission.

T-150 tank:

After replacing the engine that broke during factory breaking in on January 21st, 1941, the tank has still not been returned to a condition suitable for QA and Military Representative approval.
The gun mantlet design is unrefined and allows a gun depression of only 3 degrees as opposed to 6.5 degrees on blueprints.

T-220 tank:

The engine broke during factory breaking-in on January 25th, 1941. The experimental main bearings melted.
Presently, a new experimental engine is being installed on the tank. Chief Engineer of factory #75 comrade Chupakhin, currently at the Kirov factory, cannot vouch that the engines installed in T-150 and T-220 tanks will work.
Your decision is needed in equipping the T-150 and T-220 tanks with refined engines.

The T-150 and T-220 tanks were weighed on January 25th.
The combat weight of the T-150 is 50 tons 160 kg.
The combat weight of the T-220 is 62 tons 700 kg.

The GABTU's tactical-technical requirements give a limit of 48 tons for the T-150 and 56 tons for the T-220. I ask for your directions on whether or not it is sensible to put the T-150 and T-220 tanks through proving grounds trials if they do not meet the GABTU's requirements."

Via Padikovo museum

Monday, 19 June 2017

KV Gun Upgrades

"The following work is necessary to perform trials of KV tank armament and improvement of blueprints:
  1. Install the F-34 gun instead of the F-32 gun into the KV-1 tank at factory #92 by March 1st, 1941.
    A commission composed of representatives from ChTZ, the Kirov factory, GABTU, and GAU must perform trials and approve blueprints by March 5th, 1941. Factory #92 received a KV tank with a 76 mm F-32 gun on February 2nd, 1941.
  2. Install the 107 mm F-42 gun instead of the M-10 gun into the KV-2 tank by May 1st, 1941. Perform trials and work on blueprints, presenting them to the NKO no later than May 15th, 1941. Factory #92 received a KV tank with a large turret on January 29th.

Monday, 5 June 2017

KV-3 Evolution

"To the BTU Chief, Military Engineer 1st Class, comrade Korobkov

I report that the Kirov factory made the following decisions on the KV-3:
  1. The KV-3 will be based on the Object 221 with a future plan of increasing the side armour once an 850 hp engine is received.
  2. The armament, front, and turret armour will be increased according to State plans.
  3. Since the hulls of the Objects 220 and 221 are identical in dimensions, the transmission from the 220 will be installed in the KV-3 with the V-5 engine (700 hp) with the intention to replace it with an 850 hp engine.
  4. Trials of the V-5 engine, transmission, and KV-3 suspension will be performed on the Object 220.

Monday, 24 April 2017

Kirov Experiments, June 1941

"Report on completion of experimental works on armoured vehicles from May 20th, 1941, to June 20th, 1941

Object 220 (KV-3 base)

As of June 20th, the tank traveled 1979 km in total, 584 km after reassembly. The 850 hp V-2SN engine #2(1193-03) installed on May 30th worked for 27 h. 21 m. During trials, the following defects were discovered:
  1. 3 sets of exhaust collectors burned up over the course of 284 km.
  2. 4 final drive ferodo ribbons burned up. Cause: improper installation and adjustment.
As of June 12th, the existing defects are:

Thursday, 6 April 2017

Tank RMA

"To the Deputy People's Commissar of Defense, Marshal G.I. Kulik

The chief designer of factory #92, comrade Grabin, reports to me that the 85 mm F-30 gun installed in the T-220 tank turret made by the Kirov factory is unbalanced and the pedal trigger is positioned in an unsatisfactory manner. 

In order to balance the gun and reposition the trigger, the tank and the gun have to be sent back to factory #92 for adjustments.

I ask you to immediately order the shipment of the T-220 tank with the 85 mm F-30 gun from the Kirov factory to factory #92.

Deputy People's Commissar of Armament, Mirzakhanov."

Monday, 27 February 2017

Kirov Factory Prototypes, March 1941

"Report on the progress of experimental tank armament work from February 20th to March 20th, 1941

Object 220 KV-4 100 mm
The experimental prototype is awaiting the arrival of the V-5 engine from the subcontractor factory. Assembly of the second prototype has not started due to a lack of finished parts. The factory already began producing parts for the second prototype. The parts are in the initial stages of mechanical production. Since the plants are highly loaded with mass production parts, it is likely that the full set of parts for the prototype will not be finished in March. The turret for the second prototype is currently at factory #92, where designers from both factories are working on installation of the gun and combat equipment.

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Heavy Tank Costs

"To the Chief of the BTU, Military Engineer 1st Grade, comrade Korobov

Following decrees issued by the Government, the Kirov factory is building a series of experimental vehicles without having any contracts for them. Letter #6109 sent on November 15th, 1940, asked you to send these contracts. Letter #2239/s sent on February 20th, 1941, repeated the request. Nevertheless, we have not received any contracts from you.

I am sending you a report of the approximate cost of experimental works performed by the Kirov factory in 1941 regarding Objects ##150, 220, 221, 212, and KV-3, for the sum of 5,350,000 rubles in total. Please send us the information to issue bills regarding these projects.

Saturday, 9 January 2016

T-220: Prototype in Combat

There is an opinion that the Red Army dropped other tank projects for some time after the appearance of the KV tank. Indeed the SMK and T-100 heavy tanks were cancelled in the summer of 1940. However, it became necessary to improve the armour and armament of the tank immediately afterwards, resulting in even heavier tanks like the KV-4 and KV-5. The first step in this journey of increasing firepower, armour, and eventually size and mass was the KV-220 tank, later renamed T-220. Even though only two were made, both participated in battle during the Great Patriotic War.

Big Gun

The first signs that neither the "small turret" KV nor the "large turret" variant were satisfactory for the army were seen in June of 1940. According to a proposal for improvement of tank guns, the KV-1 should be armed with a 76 mm gun with the ballistics of the model 1931 AA gun (3-K). It was also proposed that the front armour be increased to 90-100 mm.

Some doubts arose regarding the 3-K. According to calculations, the 76 mm AA gun could penetrate 70 mm of armour at 1000 meters at an angle of 30 degrees. This is a good amount, but it turned out that the thickness of the KV-1's armour would be greater than this value. In addition, the 3-K was already removed from production, replaced with a new more powerful 85 mm AA gun that could penetrate 88 mm of armour under the same conditions.

It is not surprising that two new guns appeared of tank, SPG, and anti-tank guns: a 76 mm gun with AA ballistics and an 85 mm gun with AA ballistics. The due date for arming a KV with a small turret with both of the guns was set as September 1st, 1940. Factory #92 was chosen to develop both systems.

The gun with 3-K ballistics was indexed F-27, and the gun with 52-K ballistics was indexed F-30. The factory's chief designer, V.G. Grabin, was in charge of both projects. Much hope rested on the F-30: according to defense plans for 1940, 50% of KV tanks would be armed with this gun.

Both guns were ready by the due date and already began trials. Factory #92 didn't reinvent the wheel and followed the development path of the F-34. Using that gun as the basis, the design bureau installed new barrels and strengthened the recoil mechanisms. Thanks to this approach, the design of the guns took a short time. By September 2nd, 1940, the F-27 performed 5 trials of 122 shots in total, with satisfactory results.

By that time, the F-30 performed 2 trials of 68 shots in total. Some design flaws were discovered in the process, and the factory began working on improvements. By September 24th, the gun made 90 shots, after which a crack in the breech was discovered. Trials of the F-30 continued until October 29th, after which the gun was removed from the T-28 and sent to the Kirov factory. At the same time, factory #92 began building another F-30 prototype, which they finished in late October, but further trials stalled.

Growing Appetites

On July 17th, 1940, SNK and VKP(b) decree #1288-495ss was issued, according to which Kirov factory was tasked with producing two prototypes of improved KV tanks by December 1st, 1940. Both prototypes were to have 100 mm of front armour, but differed in armament; the first prototype got the 76 mm F-27 gun, and the second the 85 mm F-30. However, changes were soon made. Instead of the F-27, the 76 mm F-32 gun was used, and the front armour was decreased to 90 mm. In addition, it turned out that the F-30 did not fit into the existing KV-1 turret, and a new turret was necessary.

It was not possible to just change the turret, as the required changes snowballed. In the end, the tank that was referred to as KV-220, Object 220, and T-220 significantly differed from the initial KV-1, having almost caught up to the SMK in size and surpassed it in mass. The T-220 was also called KV-4 in writing at least once.

The design of this tank is connected with the 212A SPG, whose design was ordered by the same decree #1288-495ss. As the mass of the "bunker buster" crawled over 60 tons, it needed a new engine. This engine, indexed V-2SN, was developed at factory #75 in Kharkov. It differed from the stock V-2 by the addition of the mechanical supercharger from the AM-38 aircraft engine. The supercharger increased the power output of the engine to 850 hp. This engine was also installed in the T-220, along with a new gearbox, main clutch, and final drives.

All these changes lengthened the hull to 7820 mm, one meter longer than the KV-1. This increase resulted in a change to the running gear: there were now 7 road wheels and 4 return rollers. The front of the hull was 100 mm thick, same as the sides. Initially, the mass of the T-220 was estimated at 56 tons, but the tank grew to 62.7 tons.

The turret that led to this growth of mass and size was a further development of a lowered KV-2 turret. The front was taken up by the massive F-30 gun mount and a coaxial machinegun. A hatch in the rear of the turret, much like the one on the KV-2, was added for removal of the gun. Another machinegun was installed in a rotating commander's cupola. A second loader increased the number of turret crewmen to 4. The ammunition, 91 rounds in total, was also partially stored in the turret.

The development of the T-220 was not cheap. According to calculations made by the Kirov factory, the total budget of this project reached 4 million roubles. 100,000 of them were spent on the technical project, 25,000 on the model, 250,000 on design documentation, and 75,000 on corrections made after trials. Two experimental prototypes would cost 1.2 million apiece. Trials would cost half a million, and another 900,000 would be used to improve the prototypes after trials, and all this doesn't include the cost of the armament.

Unlucky Sign

Due to a large amount of assignments for the Kirov factory and a general overload of work, the tanks were not finished on time. The hull only arrived at the factory on December 7th, 1940, and assembly was complete by early January 1940. A mix-up occurred during assembly: the F-30 gun was not properly balanced. Gunnery trials were moved to a later date that never came.

On January 14th, 1941, the trials plan was approved. Factory trials were skipped in a hurry. This fact contributed to the subsequent events. Trials showed a large amount of problems with the V-2SN engine. The piston rings wore out quickly, and the engine spat out oil. Oil consumption nearly reached one liter per kilometer.

The maximum speed on a highway was 33 kph, and average speed was 21.2 kph. However, the T-220 did not drive around for long. On January 25th, after 106 kilometers driven on a highway, the engine broke. As there were no spares, trials were halted. It's worth mentioning that this was not a surprise for factory #75 representatives. Chief designer of factory #75 T.P. Chupakhin said that the engine was experimental and that he gave no guarantees regarding its reliability.

Trials continued in late January after another engine was shipped from factory #75, if only briefly. According to a report by military engineer 1st class Glukhov, the second engine broke down completely on February 3rd, 1941. The next engine was expected to arrive on February 15th, and trials were falling behind schedule. Assembly of the second T-220 lagged behind due to missing parts. In early February 1941, the turret was still at factory #92 where the F-30 gun and its equipment were being installed.

Finally, instead of a V-2SN engine, a 700 hp V-5 arrived from factory #75. By the time it arrived, several important events happened that would change the fate of the T-220.

Grabin did not forget the idea to install a 107 mm gun with ballistics of the divisional M-60 gun in the KV-2 turret. In December of 1940, it became known that the design bureau of factory #92 developed such a gun on their own initiative and is already starting to build it. This gun, indexed F-42, was proposed for installation into the T-220 turret, but was rejected. It was decided that the lighter T-150 would be put into production under the index KV-3. The T-220 prototype would serve as a testbed for the V-5 engine, which would be used on the KV-3. The same thing happened to the V-5 as to the V-2SN: it didn't last long in the T-220.

The fate of the T-220 was sealed in March of 1941. Information on heavy tanks in the German army began to arrive. Information received by Soviet intelligence led to significant increase in activity regarding tanks and tank armament. This activity also touched domestic heavy designs. The T-220 with an 85 mm gun and 100 mm of armour was deemed insufficient. Instead, a new 72 ton KV-3 started development, with the factory index 223. Overall, this tank would be further development of the T-220, with more powerful armament and 120 mm of armour.

Work on the new KV-3 didn't mean that the existing T-220 was forgotten. On the contrary, the prototype was used as much as possible by the Kirov factory as a testbed for parts and assemblies meant for the new tank. A third V-2SN was installed, this one much more reliable than its predecessors. The tank was used to test new road wheels and Vortex air filters. By June 20th, 1941, it travelled a total of 1979 km. As for the other T-220 prototype, Kirov factory only got to it in early June. Assembly went along lazily, and was planned for no earlier than mid-July. This was how the experimental vehicles met the start of the Great Patriotic War.

Battles for Leningrad

All work on the T-220 stopped after the start of the war. The factory began hurriedly producing KV-1s, focusing their efforts on simplifying the design. When evacuation of the factory began, the KV-3 hull was evacuated. As for the T-220s, nobody had time for them. This changed when the Germans reached the city in the fall of 1941 and any tank at all was worth its weight in gold.

Suddenly, people remembered about the T-220s. Since the tanks never fired a shot and one turret was still in Gorkiy at factory #92, the first T-220 had its turret replaced with a stock KV-1 turret with an F-32 76 mm gun. The same turret was installed on the second tank. On October 5th, 1941, tank T-220 with serial number M-220-1 was sent to the 124th Tank Brigade. On October 16th, the second tank was sent there with the index M-220-2.

In November of 1941, the 124th Tank Brigade and the 43rd Infantry Division fought fierce battles near Ust-Tosno. The second T-220 burned up in these battles along with its crew, commanded by Junior Lieutenant Yakhnin. According to memoirs, the tank carried the slogan "For the Motherland!". As for the first prototype, its fate is unknown.

The story of the T-220 could end here, but it goes on. On February 8th, 1943, order #012 regarding assigning crews to the 12th Independent Training Tank Regiment. The eighth tank in the list is... "For the Motherland", serial number 220-2, whose commander was V.V. Strukov.

How could this be? Usually, burned up vehicles could not be repaired, but there are exceptions. It is known that at least several burned up KV-1s were evacuated and kept on fighting. It is also known that 17 tanks from the 124th Tank Brigade were recovered. One of them must have been M-220-2, repaired in the winter of 1942 at factory #371. During repairs, it was equipped with a V-2K engine, serial number 1193-03. The tank no longer had any worth as a combat vehicle, but it worked as a hands-on training aid for tankers until 1944.

The last episode in the life of the T-220 was the use of its turret. In September of 1941, the turret was replaced with a production KV-1 turret. The tankless turret was found a home. It was installed on a concrete foundation in the 22nd Karelian Fortified Region. The result was called Artillery BOT (KV) with 85 mm gun "Victory". Here, the turret survived the whole war.

Original article by Yuri Pasholok.

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

World of Tanks History Section: KV-220

The heavy KV-1 tank that entered production in 1940 was protected with 75 mm of armour. At the time, this was one of the thickest plates in the world. However, the KV-1 had many drawbacks, and the military decided to develop a replacement in the summer of 1940.

Joseph Kotin's Heavyweight

The Kirov Factory in Leningrad and its subordinate design bureau headed by Joseph Kotin got to work. They had to develop and build two prototypes of a heavy tank by November of 1940. One was to be armed with a 76 mm F-34 gun (already in production), the other with an experimental F-30 85 mm gun developed by Grabin's design bureau.

The tank had 100 mm of armour, and was called KV-220. It is also mentioned in documents under the name T-220 and Object 220. The tank with the F-30 gun received a special enlarged turret. Depending on the source, the tank's mass reached 62 to 65 tons. The tank's designers had to lengthen the hull and add a more powerful engine.

The KV-220 began trials in January of 1941. During its first time on the proving grounds, it set an anti-record: its engine broke down on the second day. The vehicle returned to the factory. In 1941, most likely in spring, another KV-220 was built, but never participated in trials.

KV-220 to KV-3

At the same time, intelligence reported that Germany was developing a heavy 45 ton tank with thick armour and powerful armament. The Soviet military assigned the KV-3 project to Kirov factory, with even thicker armour and a 107 mm ZiS-6 gun. The gun was ready, but tank engineers were lagging behind, so the KV-220 was used as a test platform for the KV-3. It was equipped with an 850 hp engine, loaded to 70 tons, and returned to trials.

It must be said that the KV-220 did not have exceptional reliability. Trials records mention difficulty in changing gears, and failing suspension components. Nevertheless, by the start of the Great Patriotic War, the tank traveled over 1900 kilometers.

The German invasion upset all tank design plans in the USSR. The KV-3 project was transferred to Chelyabinsk, but both KV-220s were left in Leningrad. In October of 1941, they were both equipped with standard KV-1 turrets with 76 mm guns. The tanks were sent to the 124th Tank Brigade.

Prototypes on the Front Lines

Brigade commander D. Osadchev recalls that one of these vehicles was lost in battle for a railroad bridge over the Tosna river in December of 1941. The tank was hit and lost its turret.

In 2013, Yuri Pasholok discovered documents in the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense which stated that the other KV-220 remained in the 12th Independent Tank Training Regiment until at least 1944.

The original turret of the KV-220-1 prototype was removed and used on the Leningrad front as a pillbox until 1944.

Author: Vladimir Pinayev

Sources:
- M.N. Svirin, Tankovaya Mosch SSSR volume 2: V Tyazheluyu Poru, Moscow, Yauza, Eksmo, 2008
- Sovetskiye Bronirovanniye Mashiny compilation, Moscow, Eksprint, 2002
- M. Kolomiyets, Istoriya Tanka KV, Frontovaya Illustratsiya #5, 2001
- CAMD RF documents provided by Yuri Pasholok

Original article available here.

Monday, 16 June 2014

Soviet Heavy Gearboxes

Here are two gearboxes designed for Soviet heavy tanks by Shashmurin: KV-220 and KV-3. According to his memoirs, he supported a planetary gearbox for all heavy tanks, but was overruled.

KV-220 gearbox.

KV-3 gearbox.

And here is a KV-1 gearbox blueprint, dated 1942.

KV-1 gearbox.

Shashmurin bemoans the KV-1's "tractor heritage", claiming that Dukhov based the gearbox off the "Holt" tractor. However, when comparing the gearbox to that of a Model 1917 5-ton artillery tractor designed by Holt, there appear to be few similarities.


The gearbox looks much closer to another tractor design, the "International McCormick Deering".



Wednesday, 12 March 2014

KV-3 in Evacuation

As the Germans drew closer to Leningrad in the summer of 1941, belongings of the Kirov factory began being evacuated to Chelyabinsk. One of those was a partially completed KV-3.


"Order #47 of the Kirov Factory, from June 30th, 1941
Based on the order of the People's Commissar of Tank Production, I order that:
  1. Department #1 chief must arrange the delivery of technical documentation regarding the object KV-3 and delivery of the prototype, parts, and instruments to ChTZ.
  2. The Chief Engineer of department #1, comrade Kotin, must send all Object 222 blueprints, copies, technical requirements, and calculations. Due date: July 3rd, 1941.
  3. Chiefs of Mh-1, Mh-2, Mh-3, Mh-4, Mh-6, and SB-2 must send all technical documentation on its production as of July 1st, and assemble a full description of the package, as well as devices, special instruments, parts, and assembled components in our possession. Due date: July 9th, 1941.
  4. KTO Chief comrade Rohlin, OSL Chief comrade Lepin, OTsL Chief comrade Arsenyev, and TsMK Chief comrade Kulichkin must send all technical documentation, technological processes, technical requirements, blueprints, stamps, models, and all thermally conditioned stamps, models, and parts. Due date: July 9th, 1941.
  5. Department #1 Chief Lantzberd and KTO Chief Rohlin must send the following comrades to ChTZ in order to enable the production of KV-3s.
    1. Chief technologist of Department #1, Kabardino
    2. Deputy chief engineer, Duhov
    3. Senior machinist, Pavlov
    4. PTB-1 senior engineer, Zilberg
    5. PTB-1 senior engineer, Mirkin
    6. OTK MH-2 chief, Salakin
    7. OTK MH-2 senior technologist, Sokolov
    8. MH-2 designer, Ilyin
    9. MH-4 senior technologist, Mayorov
    10. TB [text rubbed out] chief, Kalugin
    11. SB-2 senior master, Zhukovskiy
    12. SKB-2 designers, Merenkov, Schneidman, Burhanov, Shashmurin, Skvortsov, Petuh, and Sobolev
  6. SB-2 Chief (Abramov) and OP-2 Chief (Nosov) should take the KV-3 vehicle hull, put the V-2-SN engine in (take it off the 220 vehicle) and send it to ChTZ on July 7th. Send the system and optics to ChTZ, do not wait for the turret to arrive.
Factory director Zaltsmann"

Sunday, 23 February 2014

World of Tanks History Section: Object 212

The history of domestic SPGs began in September of 1931. During work on a "self propelled corps triplex", SU-7 and SU-14 SPGs were developed. SU-7 was designed to use a 152 mm gun, 203 mm howitzer, and a 305 mm mortar. The SU-14 was designed to use a 107 mm gun, 152 mm gun, and a 203 mm howitzer. After the arrests of N.N. Magdeisev (designer of the B-4 howitzer) and then P.I. Syachintov, who was in charge of the SU-14 project on August 7th, 1938, the "small triplex" was cancelled.

High powered SPGs came up again in late 1939. While storming the Mannerheim Line, the Red Army needed an SPG with a high caliber gun and at least light anti-shell armour. In the middle of December of 1939, the Kirov factory and factory #185 design bureaus received an order from the Military Council of the North-West Front to develop engineering tanks with anti-shell armour. Factory #185 started two projects at once. Work began on an SPG based on the T-100. Additionally, it was decided to equip the SU-14 with armour. You would assume that the already made SPG was the faster solution, but no, work only competed on March 20th, a week after the end of the Winter War. The creation of an SPG on the T-100 chassis was not fast either, resulting in a vehicle named T-100Y, armed with a 130 mm B-13 naval gun.

The Kirov factory took a different route. In January of 1940, a prototype of the KV heavy tank (serial number U-0) arrived from the front. According to orders from the Military Council of the North-West Front, the first 4 tanks, including U-0, were to be equipped with 152 mm howitzers to defeat pillboxes. An enlarged turret was rapidly developed as a result. Work on the enlarged turret was done by SKB-3, headed by N.V. Kurin. Initially, the 152 mm model 1909/30 howitzer was planned, indexed L-21. In metal, the assault KV was equipped with a shortened M-10 (indexed MT-1). By February 10th, the new U-0 passed gunnery trials, and by February 17th, U-0 and U-1 were sent back to the front. "KV with large turret" tanks first saw battle on February 22nd. By March 3rd, there were 4 tanks of this type on the front lines.

Due to the results of the Winter War, it was decided that the "bunker buster" theme would be continued. During the spring and summer of 1940, the Kirov factory and factory #185 continued designing heavy SPGs on the T-100 and SMK chassis. However, the final fate of these vehicles was decided by the end of June. Based on the results of trials, it was clear that neither tank will be mass produced, since the KV was more protected and weighed less. The "KV with a large turret" was an adequate interim solution for the bunker buster problem.

As mentioned above, the "KV with a large turret" was a temporary answer to the need for a heavy assault SPG. Kurin's tank was a hypertrophied support tank like the artillery BT-7 (frequently called BT-7A, but that index belongs to another tank). The vehicle on the KV chassis (indexed KV-2 in 1941) had the advantage of parts commonality with its base vehicle. However, it had many drawbacks. The chassis allowed for a limited power gun, while the military demanded that the Br-2 gun be used. Due to the limited size of the turret, loading the M-10T was no easy task. The presence of a rotating turret did not mean that the tank could shoot from any angle.

After the SMK and T-100 projects died, efforts were concentrated on the creation of a heavy tank that was a modernized KV. On July 17th, 1940, the Committee of Defense of the Council of People's Commissars issued decree #198ss on the creation of new vehicles on the KV chassis. According to the decree, the Kirov factory was to develop the following:

  • Two experimental KV tanks (T-220) with 100 mm armour. One was to be armed with the F-30 85 mm gun, the other with the F-32 76 mm gun.
  • Two experimental KV tanks with 90 mm armour. One was to be armed with the F-32 76 mm gun, the other with the F-30 85 mm gun.
  • One experimental SPG with a Br-2 152 mm gun. 
The KV with 90 mm of armour received the factory index "150" (GABTU correspondence used the index T-150). It differed from its base vehicle in its 76 mm F-32 gun and a commander's cupola. It was planned that this tank, under the index "KV-3" will replace the KV-1.

The "220" tank was more distinct from the KV-1. The tank had a longer hull; the amount of road wheels increased to 7 on each side. The T-220 had a new turret, which housed the 85 mm F-30 gun. The tank used an 850 hp V-2F (V-10) engine. It was completed on December 5th, 1940.

The technical requirements for the 152 mm SPG were finalized by the end of August of 1940.

The SPG that the Kirov factory was tasked with received the index of "212". The chief engineer for this project was T.N. Golburt. The 212 was reminiscent of the SU-14-1, especially when it came to the layout of the fighting compartment. The chassis was a reworked T-220 suspension, with an engine in the middle and drive wheels at the front. The front also housed the driver's compartment. The fighting compartment was in a large casemate at the rear of the hull. On one hand, this design increased the size of the SPG. On the other, it increased crew comfort. The rear position of the casemate also reduced the distance that the Br-2 stuck out past the vehicle's hull.

2 million roubles were issued to this project. 100,000 went into the development of the technical project, 25,000 to the design of a model, 300,000 on blueprints, 75,000 on blueprint edits, 1.1 million on the production of a prototype, 100,000 on trials, and then 300,000 on repairs. The cost of the armament was not included in this sum.

The first prototype was due on December 1st, 1940, but serious corrections had to be made due to faults found during the design process. According to a GABTU report on experimental works, some components for the 212 were produced by January of 1941. Also, the technical project was completed, and sent to the Izhor factory for the production of a hull. By then, 1.5 million roubles have been spent. Work was going slowly due to higher priority of the T-150 and T-220, as well as other problems.

The hull for the new SPG was received only on March 5th, 1941. According to reports, assembly was stalled due to a lack of ready components. By the spring of 1941, the 212 project was dropping in priority at the Kirov factory. The factory received an urgent order for a heavy tank that inherited the T-150's index of "KV-3". The project, indexed "223", was developed on the T-220 chassis, with a front plate thickened to 120 mm and a new turret for the 107 mm ZiS-6 gun. The mass was estimated at 68 tons. The design of this vehicle began after learning of a new German heavy tank. Due to this load, work on the 212 stalled starting in the second half of March of 1941. April and May reports on experimental work state "No changes" in the row titled "self-propelled gun on the KV chassis". 

After Germany's attack on the USSR, designs were reconsidered. Work on some designs was accelerated. Others, either in the initial stages or not compatible with the realities of modern war, were cancelled. According to the most common version of this story, this was the fate of the 212, but it did not happen quite this way.

According to order #253ss of the People's Commissariat of Heavy Production, the KV-3 was transferred from the Kirov factory to the Chelyabinsk Tractor Factory (ChTZ). Engineers, technologists, and materials were sent to Chelyabinsk. One KV-3 made it to the front, another, without a turret or components, was sent to Chelyabinsk. In February of 1942, this KV-3 was assigned to the experimental OP-2 plant. As for the 212, until the start of August of 1941, it was still at the Kirov plant. Only then was it transferred to the Ural Factory of Heavy Machine Building (UZTM in Sverdlovsk, modern Ekaterinburg). 

Meanwhile tank production had no time for the KV-3, nor a bunker buster on its chassis. The Kirov factory was evacuated to Chelyabinsk and renamed Kirov Factory in Chelyabinsk (ChKZ), and the Izhor factory that made KV armour was sent to Sverdlovsk. UZTM was renamed to Izhor factory, and only got its name back on January 4th, 1942. UZTM was also loaded with Ordzhonikidze factory #37 and Kalinin factory #8 setting on up its territory. Factory #75, which was producing the V-5 engine was moved to Chelyabinsk, and began working on the much more necessary V-2. The situation with 152 mm guns was no better. The last Br-2 was produced by Barricade factory #221 (Stalingrad, modern Volgograd) in 1940.

Bunker busters fell out of priority, but not for long. In November of 1941, work restarted on many prototypes referred to in the SNK report "On self-propelled artillery" from May 27th, 1941. Nearly all of these projects remained in the requirements stage until 1942, there was not even a possibility of a design. Most factories tasked with designing the SPG were either busy with setting up manufacturing in the buildings where they were evacuated to in the summer and fall, or loaded with more urgent requests. Nevertheless, the list of experimental works for 1942 once again included the KV-3, scheduled for completion on May 1st, 1942. The same was true for a "two-stroke 1200 hp diesel engine" (due on October 1st, 1942), "charging the V-2 engine to 1200 hp" (due on July 1st, 1942). In March of 1942, the topic of "152 mm SPG on the KV-3 chassis (bunker buster)" resurfaces. The KV was indicated as its chassis, and the oscillating part of the Br-2 its armament. Factory #100 was listed as responsible for the chassis. Factory #8 was responsible for the gun. 1.5 million roubles was issued for this project. A prototype was expected by July 1st, 1942. However, the KV-3 was dead and buried in spring of 1942, and different vehicles were considered candidates for a bunker buster chassis.

Read more about the Object 212 and other SPGs on the KV heavy tank chassis in the book "SU-152 and other KV-based SPGs", published by Tactical Press.

Article author: Y. Pasholok.

Original article available here. 

Thursday, 28 November 2013

Heavy Trials

In 1940, two tanks were ordered to replace the KV-1: the T-150 (also known as Object 150, KV-3, and 150) and T-220 (also known as KV-220, Object 220, or just 220). The tanks were much heavier than the KV-1, and thus required much more powerful engines.

CAMD RF 38-11355-6

"Minutes of the joint commission for the trials of 700 hp and 850 hp engines, produced by factory #75, and field trials of T-150 and T-220 tanks, produced by the Kirov factory, in which these engines are placed.

Present:
  • Chief engineer of factory #75, comrade T.P. Chupahin
  • Chief of the Kirov factory tank department, comrade A.I. Lantzberg
  • From BTU KA 
    • Military engineer first class, comrade Gluhov
    • Military engineer third class, comrade Kaulin
    • Military engineer third class, comrade Voroshilov
The commission decided that:
  1. The engines were accepted for field trials too soon.
  2. The engines need factory trials, not field trials.
  3. In order to swiftly complete the engine corrections, transfer the tanks to the intra-factory commission for factory engine trials.
  4. The commission for engine trials should include the BTU engineer in charge of the T-150 and T-220.
Finish the trials before March 10th. The Kirov factory and factory #75 must provide normal conditions for the engines inside the tanks and provide tanks with working engines and cooling systems for field trials by this date."

Looks like they got too hasty. The 850 hp engine didn't get anywhere, but the KV-220 ended up with a V-5 engine turbocharged to 700 hp by April.

CAMD RF 38-11355-6

"To the chief of the 3rd department of the BTU KA, Military Engineer 1st class, comrade Afonin

In addition to the report from April 20th, 1941, I report the following with respect to completed trials:
  1. By May 4th, 1941, object #220, with additional weight to simulate the weight of a KV-3, endured 967 km worth of trials. Of those, 448 were on a road, and 519 were off-road. The V-5 engine worked for 68 hours and 30 minutes.
  2. During trials, the following failed:
    1. Balancer with idler axle: 6
    2. Lower road wheels: 2.5
    3. Torsion bars: 1
    4. Idlers: 2
  3. In addition to the note from April 20th, the following defects were discovered:
    1. The 2nd and 4th gear pins in the gearbox were sheared off.
    2. The eyelet of the main friction clutch was destroyed.
No defects were found in other components of the transmission during technical inspection.
It is necessary to point out that the off-road conditions were especially difficult, and the V-5 700 hp engine only reached second gear. Third gear is only usable on the road or hard ground.
During trials, the following data was obtained:
  1. Highway fuel efficiency: 2.9-3.2 liters per kilometer"
Sadly, this is the only page of this document that I have, but I think it gets the idea across. Keep in mind that the already portly 62 ton tank was loaded to 70 tons, heavier than any other Soviet tank that was built.

Monday, 29 April 2013

Prototype KVs

Despite the superiority of the KV over any other tank in armour and armament in 1940, the Soviet Union did not stop developing heavy tanks. Intelligence about thick armour and high penetrating guns of the potential enemy led to bigger and better tanks being developed.

KV-3 (Objects 150, 221, 222, 223)

The first is the KV-3 (Object 150). Unlike the later tank with that same name, this was essentially a slightly better KV-1, with 90 mm of armour and an improved F-32 gun (early KV-1s had the L-11 gun). The KV-3 also had a commander's cupola. However, the thick armour increased the tank's mass to 51 tons, which was too much for the engine. Regardless, the vehicle passed trials. Only one was built before the war. It was lost in battle defending Leningrad with the 123rd Tank Brigade. This tank is also known as "first KV-3", or T-150.

KV-3 (Object 150). The only immediately apparent difference between this and the KV-1 is the presence of a commander's cupola. From Solyankin et al, Soviet Heavy Tanks 1917-1941

KV-3 (Object 221) was developed with an 85 mm gun, but was never built. KV-3 (Object 222) with the F-34 76.2 mm gun met the same fate. In 1941, an electromechanical transmission was developed, but never built. KV-3 (Object 223) was the most impressive of the lot, with up to 120 mm of sloped armour, and a 107 mm ZiS-6 gun. It was never built. However, a KV-1 with a lengthened hull was built, and artificially loaded to 70 tons, in order to see if the torsion bar suspension could handle that kind of weight. It could, but the rubber tires would have to be reinforced.

KV-3 (Object 223). Model and inside. From Solyankin et al, Soviet Heavy Tanks 1917-1941

In April of 1941, it was decided that all KV-3s needed 120 mm of armour in the front of their turret and hull.

KV-220 (Object 220)

The KV-220 was another development of the KV-1. It had unsloped turret armour plates, but a roomier turret, and an 85mm F-30 gun. Armour was improved, up to 100 mm. The tank had an improved transmission compared to the KV-1. The prototype were sent to defend Leningrad with the 124th Tank Brigade, re-equipped with a 76 mm F-32 gun. The old turret was used as a part of an artillery battery. The tank was lost in battle, later repaired, and sent to a training unit.

KV-220. From Solyankin et al, Soviet Heavy Tanks 1917-1941

KV-220 being transported by crane in the background. The seventh road wheel and fourth idler are clearly visible.

An order to assign new vehicles to the 12th Independent Training Tank Regiment. A tank model "For the Motherland", serial number 220-2, engine number 1193-03 is the KV-220 that survived. CAMD RF 3674-47417-2


KV-4 (Object 224)

At the same time, another group of engineers was developing the KV-4. The tank would have a 107 mm gun, a 45 mm gun (76.2 mm in one project), and light and heavy machine guns. Some versions were equipped with a flamethrower. The powerful engine would accelerate the KV-4 up to 51 kph, depending on the project. The armour was even greater than that of the KV-3, at up to 180 mm. The mass of the tank was up to 100 tons. Over 20 designs were proposed, some are available at the Russian Wikipedia page. The most interesting ones are Kruchenyh's design (9 crew members, 180 mm of armour, 107.7 tons), Yermolayev's design (51 kph max speed), Shashmurin's design (76 mm gun in the turret, 107 mm gun in the hull), Mihailov's design (50 kph, 180 mm of armour), and Tarapatin's design (107 mm gun turret with limited traverse). Visually interesting designs are included in this article.


Three designs of the KV-4 by Shashmurin, Tarapatin, and Fedorenko, illustrating the many unconventional shapes a KV-4 could have taken.

KV-5 (Object 225)

The KV-5 projects had the same armament and engine as the KV-4, but even more armour than most of those projects (150-170 mm).  The mass was projected to increase to 100 tons. The project was meant to be finished in October of 1941, but the start of the war interfered. Simplifications to the tank had to be made, such as replacing the stamped turret with a welded one, and a single 1200 hp engine with two 600 hp ones.

The start of the war defined the priorities of KV production.

CAMD RF 38-11355-958

"By order number 1217-503ss from May 5th, 1941, the production of tanks at the Kirov factory is outlined as follows: the primary tank for 1941 will be the KV-3, and, depending on the trials of the KV-4 and the KV-5, one of these three vehicles for 1942. 
The Chelyabinsk Tractor Factory will keep producing the KV-1 with 75 mm of armour. There is a possibility to, without radically altering the production process, to increase the protection of the tank by increasing the armour to 90 mm. 90 mm thick armour that is hardened by high frequency electric current is equivalent to 100-110 mm of armour. 
An experimental prototype of a KV tank with 90 mm of armour is being developed at the Kirov factory, (order number 1288-495ss) that uses the same configuration as the KV-1, aside from the gun. The factory tests are producing satisfactory results. 
Based on this, it is possible for the Chelyabinsk Tractor Factory to, starting with January 1st 1942, begin producing KV tanks with 90 mm of armour and 76.2 mm model 1940 guns. 
This decision will allow for:
  1. Increasing the second manufacturing base for powerful tanks.
  2. Production of spare parts for existing KV-1 and KV-2 tanks.
Please confirm these developments.

Marshal of the Soviet Union G. Kulik."

However, as the war went on, it became abundantly clear that heavily armoured tanks were to be replaced with fast ones, and powerful expensive new guns were not needed. The upgraded version of the KV-1, the KV-1S, had less armour, and not more. Later KVs with the numbers 6 through 12 were either KV-1 tanks with modified armament or, in the case of the KV-7, a radically different vehicle.